A reported Iranian drone threat made the US pull its bombers from Fairford. Police arrest a seventh suspect
Sky News and The Times say a "reported threat of possible Iranian drone attack" lay behind the withdrawal. No one has been charged in public view, and a separate court case heard of Iranian plots against journalists in Britain.
The reason the United States pulled its bombers out of RAF Fairford now has a name, though not yet a proof. The base, an RAF station used by US Global Strike Command, has been central to the American air campaign against Iran. Sky News and The Times reported on Tuesday that the withdrawal followed a "reported threat of possible Iranian drone attack" on the Gloucestershire base. Earlier, US officials had told The New York Times that the move came after new details about threats to the base, as Channel 4 News noted. Washington has given mixed explanations since all 12 B-1B Lancer bombers left over the weekend: President Trump spoke of "threats", while Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it a routine rotation and said he has confidence in the security of US bases. Channel 4 News reported that US sources told it a more complex attack had been planned, while the analyst Michael O'Hanlon called the departure "no big deal". On Tuesday the British investigation also moved on. Counter Terrorism Policing said a 22-year-old British man was arrested in Westminster, London, on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts, and a property in the area was searched. He is the seventh person held over the incident of 27 September, when three vans were stopped near the base; police found petrol but no explosives. The Financial Times and Sky News both reported the arrest.
Police stress that the inquiry is live and that several lines are being pursued. Officials have offered no public evidence for the Iranian link. Andy Burnham has said only that Iran "played a part", and Tehran denies any plot and summoned the British ambassador in Tehran over the arrests. Elsewhere the Iranian dimension was in a courtroom. The Times and Sky News reported a hearing in which it was said that Iranian agents plotted to "eliminate" journalists in the UK, and that an alleged Iranian spy wanted £150,000 to "finish off" one of them. Those are allegations in a separate case, not findings, and nothing in the reports ties them to Fairford. Together they still explain the mood in Whitehall. The government must weigh a threat it cannot yet describe in public against an American ally whose aircraft have left, and against an Iran that says bases used to attack it are legitimate targets. The Conservatives, meeting in Birmingham, answered with a pledge of a "Britannia Shield" to protect the UK from drone attacks, the Financial Times reported. The practical question for ministers is simple: what, if anything, now defends the base, and who would say so if the answer were nothing? Until police charge someone, or ministers publish more of what they know, the public is left with headlines, denials and an empty runway.